Search for: All records

Increasing shares of microfibers are being detected in environmental samples and a closer look to identify the risk associated with them using ecologically relevant endpoints, especially at sensitive early life stages, is needed. To assess exposure hazards, we used rope samples representative of fiber types ubiquitous in coastal systems, where microfibers are often the most common debris type found in the water column. To compare responses to natural vs. synthetic microfibers, we used rinsed “natural” cotton, polyester, and polypropylene microfibers (80-150 µm length, 8-20 µm width) created from the rope. Larval and juvenile estuarine indicator species Inland Silverside (Menidia beryllina) and mysid shrimp (Americamysis bahia) , respectively, were exposed to these three microfiber types at three concentrations (3, 10, 30 particles/ml) along a 5-25 PSU salinity gradient to mimic estuarine conditions. Behavioral responses, growth, and ingestion were measured. The cotton microfibers were not detected in the digestive tracts of Silversides, however, both the polyester and polypropylene microfibers were detected in the Silversides’ stomach and gut lining. None of the fiber types were detected in mysid shrimps. Mysids exposed to cotton microfibers had fewer behavioral effects compared to Silversides, who responded more to cotton. Cotton exerted no effect on growth in Silversides but did cause reduced growth in the mysids at the two lower salinities. In contrast, polyester and polypropylene were identified to have a significant dose dependent effect on mysid and Silverside behavior as well as growth was affected in at least one of the three salinities at concentrations as low as 3 particles/ml. Cotton impacted both the organism’s behavior more at higher salinities, whereas polyester and polypropylene had more impacts at lower salinities. This raises concerns for microfiber impacts on estuarine ecosystems and the need for policies to limit microfiber production and outfall into the aquatic environment. 

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and Raman microspectroscopy are methods applied in microplastics research to determine the chemical identity of microplastics. These techniques enable quantification of microplastic particles across various matrices. Previous work has highlighted the benefits and limitations of each method and found these to be complimentary. Within this work, metadata collected within an interlaboratory method validation study was used to determine which variables most influenced successful chemical identification of un-weathered microplastics in simulated drinking water samples using FTIR and Raman microspectroscopy. No variables tested had a strong correlation with the accuracy of chemical identification (r = ≤0.63). The variables most correlated with accuracy differed between the two methods, and include both physical characteristics of particles (color, morphology, size, polymer type), and instrumental parameters (spectral collection mode, spectral range). Based on these results, we provide technical recommendations to improve capabilities of both methods for measuring microplastics in drinking water and highlight priorities for further research. For FTIR microspectroscopy, recommendations include considering the type of particle in question to inform sample presentation and spectral collection mode for sample analysis. Instrumental parameters should be adjusted for certain particle types when using Raman microspectroscopy. For both instruments, the study highlighted the need for harmonization of spectral reference libraries among research groups, including the use of libraries containing reference materials of both weathered plastic and natural materials that are commonly found in environmental samples.